#Rx 480 instock software
#Rx 480 instock Pc

It doesn’t sound like much of a contest on paper, but the benchmarks reveal a far closer fight than I expected. There’s little between their power consumption ratings, despite that: the RX 480’s 150W power demand is only five Watts higher than the GTX 970. The GTX 970’s lesser specification means it provides a throughput rating of 3.4TFLOPS – far less than the 5.8TFLOPS of the AMD card.

#Rx 480 instock Pc

Related: Best gaming PC specs to build yourself Its stock and boost clocks sit at 1,050MHz and 1,250MHz, and it has just one memory configuration: 4GB of GDDR5. The GTX 970 uses the older 28nm manufacturing process, which means it has half a billion fewer transistors than its rival, and it only has 1,664 stream processors. The Radeon’s specification compares well to Nvidia’s older card. Prices fluctuate pretty rapidly, which is why the GTX 970 is such a close competitor to the RX 480. The 8GB card will have faster memory, too, with throughput of 8Gbps compared to 7Gbps from the lesser card. That’ll help when managing CPU and GPU workloads in games with DirectX 12, but it’s not a feature that’ll be coming to the GTX 970.ĪMD is building the RX 480 in two versions – one with 4GB of GDDR5 memory, and one with 8GB.

#Rx 480 instock software

It has a reasonable 2,304 stream processors divided into 36 Compute Units for more granular task delegation, and its core sits at stock and boost speeds of 1,120MHz and 1,266MHz.ĪMD’s card has some software features that have also been introduced on Nvidia’s new hardware, like better asynchronous computing. The RX 480 remains a mid-range card, so expectations should be managed. That’s a bigger leap than Nvidia has taken with its new 16nm Pascal cards, and it means that AMD can cram even more transistors into the same area without increasing heat and power consumption. There’s a lot to like about the fourth iteration of the Graphics Core Next system, not least the move from a 28nm to a 14nm manufacturing process. Related: Best graphics cards in 2016 Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 v AMD Radeon RX 480 – Specs and technologyĪMD has made the unusual decision to debut its Polaris architecture with this mid-range card. If you want to read our individual reviews, you can click here for the RX 480 and the GTX 970. Is it worth shelling out for the new Radeon, or can Nvidia’s classic GTX 970 hold its own? New hardware has caused that card to drop in price, which means it’s now a key challenger for AMD’s card. The RX 480’s new architecture and lower price see it charge headlong into one of computing’s busiest battlefields – and, in particular, up against Nvidia’s older GTX 970. The red team has made bold claims about its new card, saying that it’s the best 1440p and VR-ready card for around £200. TL DR a ~1400MHz RX 480 is neck to neck with a 21 and it's not hard for them to reach that.Nvidia grabbed recent headlines with its flagship GPU launches, but AMD stole some of that thunder with the new Radeon RX 480. You can argue that the guy who did this OC test raise voltage to 1.2, however, his system is much weaker than guru3d's which lower his score a little bit and there are people that can hit 1400 without adjust voltage (pcworld editor claimed this in another thread here). Overall increase performance is 14%, but note that his stock setting is already set at 150%, compared to a 100% stock card the increase in performance is close to 20%.Ĭompare his result with MSI 1060 gaming X from guru3d:Ĥ501 vs 4657, the 1060 is 3.3% faster. Here are results of one guy doing a thorough test on the card: I have been following the owners of RX 480 on OCN for a while now and conclude that it is not true and the stock power target is severely limiting the card's overclocking power. So I have read some reviews that do test overclocking on RX 480 (both reference and AIB), many of them leave the power target at stock then made a conclusion that the card is bad at overclocking.